I have that beat today. How about going from 8913 to 1202 and then from 1202 to 210.How anybody can go from a 328 wn8 to a 3,600 wn8 in the same tank with the same crew is simply mind boggling to me.
I actually thought about that today and I had earned the money to buy the Nashorn and wanted to play it but decided against it because you have the grind of stock going against you.And I know why you're doing this in one tank that you hadn't played, but a big part of me wonders if the same sort of thing would happen if you were playing different tanks as you went along.
Not sure what that would prove. It would be pretty hard because it's not a sample as much as it is a one off. Like polling 1 person about who they're going to vote for each day rather than 10. It wouldn't really tell you anything at all.Quit after one loss.....quit after two wins?
That is odd. I don't think I've ever heard of anything like that before.Kind of weird that Tomatogg mislabeled a game. That second draw they labeled a win. We actually capped first by about 2 seconds and thought we had won but the game allowed them a draw. Odd. That sort of means that Tomatogg is wrong on any close games like that.
Not sure what that would prove. It would be pretty hard because it's not a sample as much as it is a one off. Like polling 1 person about who they're going to vote for each day rather than 10. It wouldn't really tell you anything at all.
I might try that next week. It's sort of getting on my nerves already so that would be a good break.It's just a different sampling technique. You would still work towards the same overall amount of games, it would just take longer to collect the sample.
Polling a different person each day for a thousand days is he same as sampling five hundred for two days or one hundred for ten. The sample size is still one thousand but you may see an influence more apparently in one sample over the other.