Political Meme's Only

[Zeedox]

 

[Gomez Adams]

In other words, nearly half the United States consists of a bunch of racist, womanizing, vindictive pricks.

 

[Zeedox]

 

[Gomez Adams]

It's the right judgment, and the hypothetical has merit.

The designer lives in Colorado. She wanted to expand her business without having to do that, but Colorado state law says you can't refuse anybody anything.

Imagine if a Nazi hired a Jewish designer to design a holocaust denial website and the Jewish designer was forced to do it.

Or a gay painter was hired to paint anti-LGBTQ messages on billboards and was forced to do it.

It wasn't about serving a burger or selling a car.

 

[Zeedox]

.......

Imagine if a Nazi hired a Jewish designer to design a holocaust denial website and the Jewish designer was forced to do it.

Or a gay painter was hired to paint anti-LGBTQ messages on billboards and was forced to do it.

........

Those exact scenarios are covered under hate-laws in Canada. Try to ask for either up here.

 

[Gomez Adams]

Those exact scenarios are covered under hate-laws in Canada. Try to ask for either up here.

They weren't here until this ruling.

 

[Zeedox]

...., and the hypothetical has merit.

......

BTW - Up here that's called Fraud.

 

[Gomez Adams]

BTW - Up here that's called Fraud.

Down here it's called reality.

Noone should be forced to do something that is completely against their entire nature and belief system.

We did that once before. It was referred to as slavery.

Nobody should be able to force a Jewish person to create Nazi works of art.

Nobody should be able to force a gay man to write literature about the evils of homosexuality.

And, hard as it may be for you to accept, nobody should be able to force someone that finds homosexuality completely against everything they believe in to create gay images and artwork.

 

[Gomez Adams]

 

[Gomez Adams]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1675479176873230336

 

[Zeedox]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1675479176873230336

Which is why to this day there is a Reddit forum called HermanCainAward which describes itself as so:

This subreddit serves as a statement to the danger and effect that misinformation can and does have. The creator and moderators of /r/HermanCainAward look forward to the day when there are no more nominees, and no more recipients. We actively encourage vetted Immunized to Prevent Award (IPA) posts. Anyone who visits here and decides to get vaccinated is our stated goal.

Qualifications for nomination:

• Public declaration of one's anti-mask, anti-vax, or Covid-hoax views.
• Admission to hospital for Covid.
• Someone who posts anti-vax, anti-mask, or anti-Covid views and subsequently posts about someone other than themselves being hospitalized does not qualify.

Qualifications for award:

• Award is granted upon the nominee's release from their Earthly shackles.

I'm pretty sure I once made a post in there.

 

[Zeedox]

Down here it's called reality.

Noone should be forced to do something that is completely against their entire nature and belief system.

We did that once before. It was referred to as slavery.

Nobody should be able to force a Jewish person to create Nazi works of art.

Nobody should be able to force a gay man to write literature about the evils of homosexuality.

And, hard as it may be for you to accept, nobody should be able to force someone that finds homosexuality completely against everything they believe in to create gay images and artwork.

I discussed your scenarios before, they are covered under hate laws.

Filing papers to a court and saying they are real when they are faked, is called fraud. The original request she claims she got is made-up. They've gone to the name listed at the address - he never made such a request of her business establishment. She faked his email.

The Supreme Court Doesn’t Care That the Gay Wedding Website Case Is Based on Fiction

It still feels unnerving to some, even those caught in the crossfire, to see injuries invented wholesale and lies accepted by the highest court in the land.

newrepublic.com

Certainly, this is not a sentiment uniquely inspired by or limited to the opinions the court has issued in its latest term, which ended today with rulings on anti-discrimination law and student debt relief. One of the cases handed down today was brought by a Christian website designer who wants to reject the business of same-sex couples who have in fact never sought her services and may have been invented, while the other involved a student loan debt servicer as an unwilling plaintiff in an effort to end President Biden’s student debt forgiveness program. Just these two cases alone should be enough to throw the court’s legitimacy into question—but they join a long line of recent rulings based on shaky (at best) claims and pure wish fulfillment of the militant Christian right.

The Student Loan Case’s Unwilling Participant

MOHELA, the loan servicer that is the basis for standing in the Supreme Court case against student debt cancellation, didn’t want to be associated with it at all, according to newly released documents.

prospect.org

Internal documents from the company at the heart of the Supreme Court case on student debt cancellation reinforce that it did not file, did not solicit, and indeed had nothing to do with the case at all.

The documents are internal emails from the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority (MOHELA), a student loan servicer that conducts day-to-day operations on federal student loans. Its role in the student debt case is central: The state of Missouri, one of the plaintiffs, is claiming that MOHELA will lose revenue as a result of debt cancellation, and therefore would be unable to repay money into a Missouri state fund that funds in-state schools.

That claim has been called into question. In Supreme Court oral arguments, it was revealed that MOHELA hasn’t made a contribution to that fund in 15 years; MOHELA has also said in its own financial documents that it doesn’t plan to make any payments in the future. Furthermore, an analysis from the Roosevelt Institute and the Debt Collective shows that MOHELA stands to gain revenue if debt cancellation goes forward, because it received additional servicing rights and its liability on certain accounts would be extinguished.