The Worst of the Police

I'm wondering two things:

First, how bad are your policing practices if you have to resort to this?

Second, how is the cop not guilty of copyright violation by playing copyrighted music for public display while being paid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeedox
I don't get it. If the cops are playing the music aren't they the ones breaking the copyright? I mean if I go to a bar and I'm talking with some friends at a birthday party and somebody is recording it on a phone and a song is playing in the background how the hell is that copyright infringement? It's not you controlling the damn music. You're simmply filming a scene.
 
I don't get it. If the cops are playing the music aren't they the ones breaking the copyright? I mean if I go to a bar and I'm talking with some friends at a birthday party and somebody is recording it on a phone and a song is playing in the background how the hell is that copyright infringement? It's not you controlling the damn music. You're simmply filming a scene.

You're correct however, it is very much easier to say that a video has copyright music on it and Youtube will take it down, then it is to defend a video that has copyright music in the background as news/fair use. And defending will most likely cost you time, effort and cash.

That being said, as Gomez stated earlier, send a copy of the tape to the copyright people about the cops doing this, and let their attorneys talk to the cops.


edit: commas for clarity
 
Last edited:

A federal appeals court in New York cleared the way on Tuesday for the city to release hundreds of thousands of police disciplinary records, a major milestone in a long and bitter political battle to open the records to public scrutiny.

The ruling by a three-judge panel, which also affects firefighters and corrections officers, dealt a heavy blow to efforts by officers’ unions to block the records’ release.
 
I've never understood how those records could be kept secret. Ever. They say it's to prevent frivolous lawsuits and the like, but come on. If you're that worried about being sued, then clearly you are doing something wrong.
 
I've never understood how those records could be kept secret. Ever. They say it's to prevent frivolous lawsuits and the like, but come on. If you're that worried about being sued, then clearly you are doing something wrong.

The better part will be the liability of anyone else who hires dismissed police now elsewhere.
 
That happens here a lot.

It's always after an officer is fired for something and an investigation occurs that you find out he had 3 disciplinary charges against him and was fired from the next county over.