The Heritage Foundation is a non-profit violating US tax code. Here is how to file a complaint anonymously with the IRS.
- Thread starter Zeedox
- Start date
The problem is, they're flat out wrong.
They're allowed to support policy. Example: Greenpeace can advocate for and advertise support for any legislation that reduces carbon emissions.
They are not allowed to say "Vote for Joe Biden".
Heritage Foundation to this point has never so much as mentioned a candidate or political party.
They're allowed to support policy. Example: Greenpeace can advocate for and advertise support for any legislation that reduces carbon emissions.
They are not allowed to say "Vote for Joe Biden".
Heritage Foundation to this point has never so much as mentioned a candidate or political party.
That sounds oddly specific to one political group.
It DOES NOT SAY THAT on the Heritage Foundation's website.
It says that on the PROJECT 2025 website. https://www.project2025.org/
It is perfectly legal for Heritage Foundation to support Project 2025.
It says that on the PROJECT 2025 website. https://www.project2025.org/
It is perfectly legal for Heritage Foundation to support Project 2025.
Perhaps we are not seeing the same front page?
Because mine has a big fat link to Project2025, prominently displayed which sure looks an aweful lot like support.
Because mine has a big fat link to Project2025, prominently displayed which sure looks an aweful lot like support.
Again, it is PERFECTLY LEGAL for them to link to a third party story or site and support it. They just can't have actual campaign support on their site, for example a fund raiser directly for Donald Trump where you can contribute right there on the spot.
They also can't sponsor an event, like pay for a rally or sponsor a dinner where the proceeds go to Trump's political campaign.
Everybody does it. In fact, the ACLU is probably the worst at it. https://www.aclu.org/
Look at all the articles that are anti-Trump that they're pointing to right there on the home page. That is perfectly legal. This is absolutely no different.
The people that came up with the idea it's illegal are fucking morons.
They also can't sponsor an event, like pay for a rally or sponsor a dinner where the proceeds go to Trump's political campaign.
Everybody does it. In fact, the ACLU is probably the worst at it. https://www.aclu.org/
Look at all the articles that are anti-Trump that they're pointing to right there on the home page. That is perfectly legal. This is absolutely no different.
The people that came up with the idea it's illegal are fucking morons.
Under the your feds, political activity is defined as:
Now I understand these are not federal employees but that definition is pretty accurate as far as political activity is concerned across all political spectrums.
Supporting a thought or idea with their web space is a cost they've assumed and that means support for that partuicular political idea in this case - project 2025
Now I understand these are not federal employees but that definition is pretty accurate as far as political activity is concerned across all political spectrums.
Supporting a thought or idea with their web space is a cost they've assumed and that means support for that partuicular political idea in this case - project 2025
Project 2025
With the Biden administration half over and with the immediate dangers inherent to one-party rule in Washington behind us for now, it’s past time to lay the groundwork for a White House more friendly to the right. For decades, as the left has continued its march through America’s institutions...
www.heritage.org
Their own website...
Again, it's perfectly legal. It always has been. It always will be.
Obviously, you didn't bother looking at the ACLU home page that is littered with anti-Trump stories. They are lawyers. They know it's perfectly legal.
Writing about something is not supporting it.
Me wishing you luck or me writing about how bad a person you are isn't supporting you or your opponent. Me giving you money towards whatever it is you're doing or funding your opponent is support. If you can't see the difference between the two, I can't help you.
Obviously, you didn't bother looking at the ACLU home page that is littered with anti-Trump stories. They are lawyers. They know it's perfectly legal.
Writing about something is not supporting it.
Me wishing you luck or me writing about how bad a person you are isn't supporting you or your opponent. Me giving you money towards whatever it is you're doing or funding your opponent is support. If you can't see the difference between the two, I can't help you.
No, it isn't. You're reaching because it's what you want to believe.
When a man goes to jail for failure to follow a court support order for his ex-wife, do you think that's about something he wrote, or he put on a website?
No.
It's about money.
In this country, support is all about money and nothing more.
Supporting your kid in college isn't giving her a ride or wishing her luck. It's paying tuition and buying books.
I can't put it any plainer than that.
When a man goes to jail for failure to follow a court support order for his ex-wife, do you think that's about something he wrote, or he put on a website?
No.
It's about money.
In this country, support is all about money and nothing more.
Supporting your kid in college isn't giving her a ride or wishing her luck. It's paying tuition and buying books.
I can't put it any plainer than that.
