Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire

www.rawstory.com

'He must be impeached': Calls for ouster of Clarence Thomas grow after latest bombshell

New revelations about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's business dealings with Texas Republican megadonor Harlan Crow on Thursday led to intensified calls for the right-wing justice's impeachment, as ProPublicareported on a previously undisclosed real estate transaction between the...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com

A week after the first report on Crow's funding of Thomas' travel was published, ProPublica revealed that Crow purchased two vacant lots and the home where Thomas' mother lived, all owned by Thomas and his family, in Savannah, Georgia in 2014.

The purchase, completed for $133,363, marked "the first known instance of money flowing from Crow to the Supreme Court justice," the news outlet reported.

Federal disclosure laws state that in most cases, Supreme Court justices and other government officials must disclose real estate transactions over $1,000.

"Thomas did not disclose the purchase as required by law. He must be impeached," said Democratic strategist Sawyer Hackett.
Click to expand...
 
And there's nothing at all illegal about any of it.

Immoral? Sure. Illegal? No.

Either way it doesn't matter because there is no code of conduct for judges.

People are just shouting at the rain over it all.

Edit to add: TECHNICALLY, the failure to report the sale of the house was illegal, but at best it would be a civil penalty if any at all.
 
Last edited:
www.msnbc.com

Clarence Thomas could face federal investigation over property sale

More revelations from ProPublica have turned up the heat on the beleaguered justice.
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com

Following the latest ProPublica report, Whitehouse is pushing for Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Thomas. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a government watchdog organization, noted Friday that, under the Ethics in Government Act, the attorney general can bring civil actions for knowingly and willfully falsifying or knowingly and willfully failing to file or report any information that such individual is required to report, with civil penalties up to $50,000 and the possibility of criminal sanctions as well.
Click to expand...
 
Clearance Thomass is a rubber stamp.


Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas drew gasps on Monday when he asked several questions during oral arguments.

Thomas, who hadn't asked a question since Feb. 22, 2006, broke 10 years of near silence during a case, Voisine v. U.S., involving a federal law preventing people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from owning firearms.
Click to expand...


Tell me again how he's not an MAGA/NRA mouthpiece.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back